On Tuesday 2016-03-01 09:32 +0800, L. David Baron wrote: > The W3C is proposing a charter for: > > TV Control Working Group > https://www.w3.org/2016/02/tvcontrol.html > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Feb/0005.html > > Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through > Friday, March 18. > > Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should > say as part of this charter review.
So given that we've been pretty involved in the work in the community group that led to this working group, I think we probably should say something here. I just talked to SC Chien and Joe Cheng about our involment and ran this plan (although not the text) past them. I think we should abstain from the review, but abstain with comments, saying something like: Although we've participated in the development of this work in the community group, this is an area that we're becoming less involved in. We're also concerned about the general applicability of this work to the Web. Our own use of the subset of this API that we implement has been restricted to privileged apps on Firefox OS, and we're not aware of how it could fit in to the Web's security model. Does this seem reasonable? -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
