On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Kyle Huey <m...@kylehuey.com> wrote:
> rr runs fine under VMWare ;) > Yes, but asking developers to fire up a VM and sync their changes to that VM when adding a test adds a pretty high impediment to adding a test. (Your post might have tongue-in-cheek on this point, but I can't quite tell). But anyway, this is all to say that we should be handling this in automation. > > - Kyle > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Bobby Holley <bobbyhol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Kyle Huey <m...@kylehuey.com> wrote: >> >>> Seems like a good thing to expect developers to do locally today. >>> >> >> I don't think that's realistic for developers who aren't on Linux. >> >> >>> >>> - Kyle >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Justin Dolske <dol...@mozilla.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > On 2/14/16 9:25 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: >>> > >>> > How far are we from being able to use cloud (rather than local) machine >>> >> time to produce a trace of an intermittently-failing bug? Some >>> one-click >>> >> procedure to produce a trace from a failure on treeherder seems like >>> it >>> >> would lower the activation energy significantly. >>> >> >>> > >>> > And with that... At some point, what about having all *new* tests be >>> > battle-tested by X runs of rr-chaos testing? If it passes, it's >>> allowed to >>> > run in the usual CI automation. If it fails, it's not (and you have a >>> handy >>> > recording to debug). >>> > >>> > Justin >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > dev-platform mailing list >>> > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org >>> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-platform mailing list >>> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
