What is the relationship between this WG and the spec draft at http://www.w3.org/TR/credential-management-1/
Seems like there's potential for integration between the two? / Jonas On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Richard Barnes <rbar...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Obviously, given the earlier FIDO thread here, I think this is good work to > support. > > I think the charter is in pretty good shape. The only comment I have is > that it talks about "attestations" without defining what is being attested. > This could be addressed with the following change: > > OLD: "Attestation and signature formats defined for interoperability." > NEW: "Formats for signed data and verifiable attestations of a signer's > properties." > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:09 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > >> The W3C is proposing a charter for: >> >> Web Authentication Working Group >> http://www.w3.org/2015/12/web-authentication-charter.html >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2015Dec/0010.html >> >> Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through >> January 25. >> >> Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should >> say as part of this charter review. >> >> (It seems likely that we want to support it given that Richard is >> involved, and one of the proposed co-chairs.) >> >> -David >> >> -- >> 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 >> 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 >> Before I built a wall I'd ask to know >> What I was walling in or walling out, >> And to whom I was like to give offense. >> - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914) >> > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
