On Thursday 2016-01-07 08:52 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:05 AM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > > This specification is derived from an upstream WHATWG specification. > > And therefore hasn't removed the storage mutex concept it seems. Not > sure if that's careworthy since we don't implement from TR/ anyway, > but I thought I'd mention it.
Could you give a brief explanation of what the storage mutex is, and why it was/should be removed? -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
