On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Bobby Holley <bobbyhol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As XPConnect module owner, I'd like to get it in record that we will almost > certainly not take this or any support code for it (i.e. code in js-ctypes) > in mozilla-central. > > Well, I was already have a modified version of mozilla-central, if the upstream is not possible, then I just need to maintain the fork and can not upstream the code. > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <pidgeo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On 1/3/2016 10:24 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > > > >> So that we could be able to access xpcom in worker. > >> And we could be able to implement thunderbird new msg protocol in pure > >> javascript > >> > > > > I will point out that Thunderbird developers are already looking into > > replacing the xpcom use of message protocols, so if that is the primary > > goal, then you are wasting your time, I am afraid. > > > > I will also point out that both JavaScript and C++ have moved on from the > > time xpconnect was developed to the point that use of xpconnect requires > > designing APIs that are uncomfortable to use from C++ or JavaScript (or > > even both!), so it is a much better investment of time to move APIs to > > newer paradigms than it is to try to develop a system that almost no one > > really understands. > > > > -- > > Joshua Cranmer > > Thunderbird and DXR developer > > Source code archæologist > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dev-platform mailing list > > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
