WFM. I'll see what I can do about fixing RTCCertificate. I think that the breakage should be minimal if I just change it.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote: > On 10/16/15 2:00 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure what custom code you're talking about. What exactly are you >>> proposing? >> >> >> Date is fundamentally just an integer when you get down to it. Treat >> it like one. An integer value is copied when you return it, so >> modifications don't affect the underlying structure. > > > Integer values also do structural ==, not object identity ==. And can't be > mutated (mutating actually just creates a new value) > > You seem to be arguing that Date should really be a value type in ES. That's > an argument I'm sympathetic to, but that's not the Date we have right now. > > So if you want to have value type like behavior, use a value type; for now > long long (in IDL terms; Number in JS terms) is good. If you want to have a > possibly-shared reference to a mutable thing, then Date makes sense. Once > ES grows actual value types, we can think about doing something like that > for date return values in APIs. > > > -Boris > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
