Included auto-closed bugs in that count sounds misleading at best. On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wes Kocher <wkoc...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> What if the query was changed to only count bugs resolved 'fixed'? I > believe all of the inactive intermittent bugs get closed as worksforme or > invalid? > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 2015-09-28 7:26 AM, Carsten Book wrote: >> >>> 3. Statistics >>> >>> Intermittent Bugs filed this month [1]: 400 >>> Intermittent Bugs closed this month [2]: 214 >>> >> >> In the past couple of weekends, I spent some time fixing the worst >> offenders in intermittent oranges according to OrangeFactor, and the number >> 214 above was *shocking* to me since almost none of the bugs I looked at >> had any activity on them. Skimming over http://mzl.la/1PJ287C, it seems >> that many of these are bugs that were closed because the failures weren't >> happening before, which makes it confusing to mix that pool with the actual >> number of bugs that were fixed as a result of a patch landing. >> >> Can we somehow improve the statistics here to measure the actual bug >> fixes? A change as simple as filtering out "nob...@mozilla.org" as the >> assignee of the bug narrows the list down to 45 bugs, but that is probably >> inaccurate since the merge tool had not adjusted the assignee of bug 703773 >> for example. But just filtering based on the assignee seems like a better >> way to get data closer to reality here. >> >> Cheers, >> Ehsan >> > > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
