On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2015-09-24 1:41 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> >> * Coverity, a proprietary tool with a great (but slow) web interface. > > Does anybody look at these regularly? I would be interested to know if they > produce high quality results these days. My past experience with Coverity > has been that it's full of false positivies.
Eric Rahm looks at them regularly. He's on PTO until next week. From what he's told me the false positive rate is quite high, and the true positives are mostly small things like leaks on error paths, but occasionally it finds something significant. He's been looking at them for some time which suggests he thinks it's worth the effort. Nick _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
