On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:07 AM, James Graham <ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk> wrote: >> I am extremely wary of designing a solution like this where there's a single >> master switch that any code can unilaterally flip; if the assumption that >> libraries will never want to delay rendering turns out to be false it will >> force page authors to deal with N library-specific protocols to indicate >> that they are no longer blocking rendering, and give any one component that >> ability to override all others. > > Agreed, I also don't want us to repeat a <meta name=viewport>-style > design. I thought it was agreed that was unfortunate last time around.
I'm open to counter proposals. But blocking scripts are also bad. As is requiring inline scripts since they don't work with websites that want to use CSP. / Jonas _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
