On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Paul Rouget <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Panos Astithas <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you are thinking about shipping them as part of browser.html, we still > > have XUL dependencies that we need to get rid of first and that work is > > independent from moving the code to a top-level devtools/ directory. > > We don't use XUL, but we can still open XUL windows. > Would it be possible to use the devtools without chrome://browser/ > being accessible? I doubt it, although, to be honest, I am not entirely sure. We already use paths like chrome://browser/content/devtools/debugger.xul in the code, so they would have to be changed first. Would using resource: URLs work better for browser.html? _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
