On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> wrote:
> The existence of aFoo goes along with the existence of mFoo, sFoo, kFoo, > and others I might have forgotten. Not that I particularly care about > aFoo, but why strike this one and not the others?[1] FWIW many coding styles do have special style for class data members. I think highlighting data members is more useful than parameters. In fact I would love to get rid of aFoo but the last time I tried, the 'a' prefix had considerable support. Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea lurpr .a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr esn _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
