On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Seth Fowler <[email protected]> wrote: > My impression was that the conclusion was “refcounted objects are not banned > inside C++ lambdas” - i.e., no policy change from the status quo - "but we > need to be aware of the pitfalls”. The pitfalls are discussed pretty > thoroughly in the thread.
Capturing of raw pointers to refcounted objects was in fact banned - a static analysis forbidding it was introduced in bug 1153304. (Note that, as I discovered recently, the static analysis was over-eager and was also complaining about raw pointers to refcounted object being taken as an argument or used as a local variable inside a lambda - I'm about to land a fix for that in bug 1170388). Cheers, Botond _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
