One more place:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1147921
-hb-
On 3/26/2015 16:14, Patrick McManus wrote:
good catch.. looking at
https://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/ident?i=NS_SOCKETTRANSPORTSERVICE_CONTRACTID
the only uses I see other than the one Ehsan unearthed are expected.. so
maybe that's the sum of the short term work.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 2015-03-26 11:00 AM, Kyle Huey wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Patrick McManus <mcma...@ducksong.com>
wrote:
Is this thread mostly just confusion from these things sounding so much
alike? Or am I confused now?
Most likely.
Does anyone have actual data to show that this is a problem?
There's some truth to it. Looks like some code uses the *socket*
transport service when it probably means *stream* transport service.
Example: <http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/
workers/ServiceWorkerEvents.cpp#249>
But other examples such as DOM Cache are not affected as far as I can tell.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
