The differences are as follows: - DOM Promise don't implement Promise.defer; - the scheduling of asynchronous tasks will sometimes be different.
If you rely on neither, you should be ok. Task.jsm will be migrated to DOM Promise once we are satisfied that it doesn't break anything on m-c. Cheers, David On 01/11/14 21:00, [email protected] wrote: > On Saturday, November 1, 2014 12:50:24 PM UTC-7, Kyle Huey wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 12:42 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The reviewer should understand asynchronous Promise operations, preferably >>> the OS.File promises >> >> We shouldn't be landing new code that uses Promise.jsm in mozilla-central. >> >> - Kyle > > I understand and agree... right now my module uses Promise.jsm, but I'd think > it trivial to convert that to native Promise objects. > > Task.jsm, though, still uses it, and the module I'm proposing relies on > Task.jsm pretty heavily... Are there plans to break Task.jsm's dependency on > Promise.jsm? If not, is that okay? > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
