On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <pidgeo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> From another point of view: Mozilla, for over a decade, provided a
> relatively featureful toolkit for building UIs known as XUL. If the
> argument is that we should be using HTML instead of XUL, then wouldn't it
> make sense to provide an at-least-as-featureful HTML toolkit to make
> migration easy and relatively painless?


I already said I'm not proposing a wholesale migration here. Please stop
misconstruing me.

Rob
-- 
oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo
owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo
osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o
oioso
oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo
owohooo
osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro
ooofo
otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to