On 2/10/14 17:17, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Is support for WOFF2 feature detectible?
Not directly, but it would be fairly easy for a site that really wants
to detect it via CSS+JS hackery to do so. There'd be some overhead to
such detection, though.
Or do people need to hardcode
UA versions to know what UAs support it?
I believe that's what Google Fonts currently does, though IMO a better
approach is to serve CSS that offers both WOFF2 and older (more
widely-supported) formats, using the @font-face src descriptor's "format
hint" to let the browser choose the optimal resource depending on what
it supports:
@font-face {
font-family: MyFont;
src: url(myfont.woff2) format("woff2"),
url(myfont.woff) format("woff"),
url(myfont.eot) format("embedded-opentype"),
url(myfont.ttf) format("truetype");
}
etc.
JK
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
