I've been steering the underlying
ICameraControl implementation (dom/camera) towards better support
for ImageCapture's usage model for a while.
If we can fill in support for the missing features we currently
use (see CameraCapabilities.webidl)
then I don't see why ImageCapture couldn't become the API used by
the Camera app -- depending on what's involved in getting
platform-supported video recording to work (or if it works
already).
--m.
On 14-09-04 03:10 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
It
seems like this API addresses at least some of the use cases of
our Camera API for Firefox OS (things such as being able to
display a preview video stream, being able to adjust some picture
quality parameters, etc.).
I am wondering if you know how much of the Camera API use cases
this is going to address, and whether it can be something that we
can build advanced camera apps on top of?
(CCing Mike, our Camera API guru.)
Thanks!
Ehsan
On 2014-09-03, 5:15 AM, Alfredo Yang wrote:
Summary:
Allow web authors to take photo via gUM video track.
Bug:
Main tracking bug,
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=888177
Spec:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/default/media-stream-capture/ImageCapture.html
Platform coverage:
All platforms.
Target release:
late 2014.
Pref:
dom.imagecapture.enabled
Background:
The spec is pretty much a draft. I focus on implementing subset
needs to take advantage of high resolution camera hardware in
platform like B2G [1].
Best regards,
Alfredo
[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1054905
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
|
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
