On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Ed Morley <emor...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Agreed that this case is possibly slightly different - however this change > is merely exposing already flaky tests - and this change is very much > overdue. If the tests mentioned are really that important, then could we > please get people allocated to fixing them?
We have allocated people to fixing them. These bugs were explicitly assigned in the 34.2 iteration: Bug 947574 Bug 1002439 Bug 1041537 and we've made some significant progress in tracking them down. But as you know, fixing these issues can be relatively difficult. > Ultimately no one individual test should have the right to destroy the SnR > for a suite - and if we don't have this policy as a rapid (and enforceable > in practice) means to control rogue tests, then the only other hammer the > sheriffs have is to hide entire suites. If we're reduced to interacting with each other with hammers, then we've failed. Firefox peers will not ignore needinfo or review requests. If you feel that they are, then you can escalate to me as module owner. I do not ignore requests, and am quite responsive to email and IRC pings. Gavin _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
