Yes, I agree with you for virtual device storage API. But before discussing the detail of virutal device storage api, the first step here is to figure out where should new event handler be added?
Since there is not only new event handler been added but also a set of APIs potentially, I support to Dave' suggestion. ----- 原始郵件 ----- 寄件者: "Ehsan Akhgari" <[email protected]> 收件者: [email protected], [email protected] 寄件備份: 2014 7 月 21 星期一 下午 11:32:33 主旨: Re: Intent to implement: navigator.deviceStorage On 2014-07-20, 10:43 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> Perhaps adding an >> EventListener on Window would be enough, so that we can keep the same API? > > As Dave said, we might still need to propose a set of WebAPI for Virutal > Device Storage (Then we can have apps like dropboxstorage app, > googledriverstorage app and sambaStorage app). If we can add > navigator.deviceStorage then these old and new proposed APIs can be put > together. (not sure this is a principle of designing Web API or we can split > functions/events to different places). That sounds good, but of course we need a more concrete proposal for the virtual device storage API. Cheers, Ehsan _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
