On 2014-05-13, 10:47 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 5/12/2014 4:07 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
So I'd like to propose that our C++ style require one-arg
constructors to be marked explicit unless there's a clear comment
explaining why the constructor is implicit.
Seems there's general agreement. Please make this change to the style
guide.
Anyone here up for doing some static analysis to detect and fix
in-tree instances of this?
If you think this would be a good bug for a contributor, file+flag please.
- mhoye
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
