Can we agree on using the using directive instead of typedefs when it comes to
namespaces? I think it's less likely to lead to confusing compile errors than
typedefs.
class nsSVGUtils
{
using mozilla::gfx::FillRule;
using mozilla::dom::Element;
public:
static FillRule GetFillRule(Element* aElement);
};
Thanks,
Monica
----- Original Message -----
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Jonathan Watt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The style guide doesn't seem to address this:
> >
> > When I have, say, a class in the global namespace called nsSVGUtils, what
> > is preferred:
> >
> > class nsSVGUtils
> > {
> > public:
> >
> > // blah blah
> >
> > static mozilla::gfx::FillRule GetFillRule(mozilla::dom::**Element*
> > aElement);
> >
> > // blah blah
> >
> > };
> >
> > or:
> >
> > class nsSVGUtils
> > {
> > typedef mozilla::gfx::FillRule FillRule;
> > typedef mozilla::dom::Element Element;
> >
> > public:
> >
> > // blah blah
> >
> > static FillRule GetFillRule(Element* aElement);
> >
> > // blah blah
> >
> > };
> >
> > Or is either fine?
> >
>
> I strongly prefer the latter. It makes the code a lot more readable.
>
> Rob
> --
> Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni
> le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa
> stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
> 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp
> waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w *
> *
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
