On 2013-10-22 6:34 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 10/22/2013 6:19 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-10-22 4:06 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
I don't think that there is enough data yet to make a decision.
Hopefully funnelcake results which help make a more informed choice. If
it turns out that that Firefox wants this decision reconsidered, what
groups and goals would be affected by asking for ICU or at least the
number-format and date-format APIs to be disabled for download weight
reasons in 27?
More and more people in libxul want access to ICU. See the dependency
list for bug 915735 for a (partial) list.
I'm aware of that, but I'm not clear on whether any of those features
require the language data we're talking about here, and whether having
the single UI locale or all locales would be necessary. I know that the
indexeddb use-case only requires the collation tables and not any of the
locale data.
Yes, that's correct. Simon and Jonathan can probably clarify which
parts of ICU they're hoping to use.
Cheers,
Ehsan
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
