On 6/25/2013 1:19 PM, Dave Townsend wrote:
I wish we could get JS code coverage too though.
I think JS code coverage is a worthy goal, but it shouldn't block
getting automated code coverage. The problem is that getting this to
work reliably basically requires changes in the JS engine in the
following ways:
1. An instrumentation-based approach basically needs a maintained,
tested, quality decompiler for the Reflect.parse AST trees
2. Using the new Debugger APIs requires basically making the debugger
usable for xpcshell tests.
3. A third approach I had, using bhackett's pc-counts, would require
fixing them in IonMonkey and more well-supporting them.
--
Joshua Cranmer
Thunderbird and DXR developer
Source code archæologist
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
