On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Rob Arnold <tell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree; it should be no worse than today. I do have some concerns with > dispatching a mouse move event that contains coordinates the mouse may not > have been at but the visual results for scrolling ought to be nice. Only > other concern is if there are applications that make use of the higher > frequency mouse events to do extra processing (ex: a finger painting app > would want more samples for curve reconstruction). Otherwise I think it > makes sense. > I did some tests with various browsers on Windows and we normally only get 60-ish mouse-moves per second max. So if we're keep our frame rate up, we should be OK. Rob -- Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28] _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
