On Jun 15, 2007, at 15:23 , Oliver Lietz wrote:
Am Freitag, 15. Juni 2007 schrieb Grégory Joseph:
Err, Oliver, I think we all agree with your comments, but they're
kind of out-of-scope with the subject at hand ;)
I think it's in the scope of package renaming/class moving which
should be
done when it's time for a new major release.
So more for 4.0 than 3.1 imho.
No small steps but one big refactoring.
That will probably scare people away or make the whole upgrade
process slower. By doing smaller/simpler steps, I think get more
chances to stay up-to-date. Also, there's a chance that we will
slowly identify a couple of points that we want to keep more stable,
i.e. expose as an api for external modules/projects.
Regarding the Content/NodeData naming: one of the goals is to re-
align with the JCR interfaces, and allow multiple levels of wrapping
(i.e we will have, for instance, a Content impl. that will only take
care of security and delegate to a wrapped Content, etc). The current
names are there for historical reasons, and I think if we rename
them, that will mostly depend on how they evolve.
g
----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://documentation.magnolia.info/docs/en/editor/stayupdated.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
