Adding Jed and generalizing subject: Jed, it does not sound like we will get the core crypto landed without organizational effort and some luck:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554827#c18 Are you comfortable allowing Q/A to be the arbiter of acceptable performance on device? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Pappalardo" <[email protected]> To: "Jared Hirsch" <[email protected]>, "No-Jun Park" <[email protected]>, "Sam Penrose" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:48:48 PM Subject: re: 968567 Just a quick follow-up... No-Jun and I were just discussing this and though we both agree that it's slow, there are some user experience actions where 'perceived' slowness seems less critical. Ideally, we'd like every component of our applications to be lightning fast, but as a user, it doesn't seem like it would necessarily be perceived as abusive, since it's part of the one-time 'setup' experience. If it seems realistic that we can make it better, great. But if it's going to take enormous effort to get this moving (and it's not likely that's going to happen), should we consider closing this? Bug 968567 - Expose the NSS implementation of PBKDF2 HMAC SHA256 from bug 974162 to chrome JS for use by FxAccounts _______________________________________________ Dev-fxacct mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxacct

