On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 9:59 PM Benjamin Kaduk <bjkf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University of Guelph. Do 
> not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know 
> the content is safe. If in doubt, forward suspicious emails to 
> ith...@uoguelph.ca.
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 2:07 PM Rick Macklem <rmack...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> +enum krb_imp {
>> +       KRBIMP_UNKNOWN,
>> +       KRBIMP_HESIOD1,
>> +       KRBIMP_MIT
>> +};
>>
>
>
>
> I only skimmed the diff so far, but I don't think KRBIMP_HESIOD1 makes much 
> sense as a name -- Hesiod is a directory service of sorts that came out of 
> MIT's Project Athena (it uses the "HS" DNS record class and we have an 
> implementation of its functionality in libc) but is otherwise unrelated to 
> Kerberos.  Presumably you wanted something Heimdal-ish here?
Duh. Yes. I once used Hesiod, but I have no idea why I typed that
instead of Heimdal. (It was meant to refer to the older Heimdal, up to 1.5.)

As I recall, the value is ever used in the current code, since it always
tests for it being UNKNOWN, to acquire it and if it is MIT after that,
but I can commit a name change.

rick

>
> -Ben

Reply via email to