In message <8200b60d-fcf9-431f-a417-7c0865fee...@freebsd.org>, Kyle Evans write s: > On 7/24/25 14:36, Cy Schubert wrote: > > In message <aikimiqbmx_oa...@freefall.freebsd.org>, Lexi Winter writes: > >> > >> > >> --/cJljwJYtPl3uHOB > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >> Content-Disposition: inline > >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >> > >> hi Cy, > >> > >> Cy Schubert: > >>> In message <202507241824.56oio88s005...@gitrepo.freebsd.org>, Lexi Winter > = > >> =20 > >>> writes: > >>>> UPDATING: Note the Kerberos package rename (c7da9fb90b0b) > >> =20 > >>> Shouldn't this be the other way around? Heimdal is FreeBSD-kerberos while > = > >> =20 > >>> MIT is FreeBSD-krb5. I objected to the name change because it could cause > = > >> =20 > >>> people to assume they were one in the same. > >> > >> although i understand you objected to D51420, i landed it anyway[0] > >> which means the packages are back to their old names and there are > >> no more FreeBSD-krb5* packages. > >> > >> let me explain why i did this: > >> > >> - the change to the package names caused friction both inside the > >> project (e.g., it broke the OCI build scripts) and outside the > >> project (according to reports i received from downstream users). > >> > >> - it was not clear there is any advantage to renaming the packages. > >> > >> - due to above i was specifically asked to land this commit by several > >> people, including a pkgbase maintainer, and one of my mentors at the > >> time. > >> > >> - i considered this a reasonable course of action because this restored > >> the previous status quo and undid a change that (as far as i'm aware) > >> hadn't been reviewed by #pkgbase, so in case of doubt, i erred on the > >> side of restoring the previous behaviour. > >> > >> i apologise for reverting your code over your stated objections but now > >> that we are back to the previous behaviour, we can discuss whether to > >> rename these packages, which i suggest doing via a Phabricator review > >> that includes #pkgbase. > > > > No offense taken. I'm ok if those using the packages understand fully. > > > > Do people want /usr/src/krb5 renamed to /usr/src/kerberos5 when Heimdal is > > removed? I'm open to this. > > > IMO it's fine to stay where it is; krb5 is a designation given to it > elsewhere (upstream?), not just a FreeBSD-ism. If it were hard to > recognize what that may be for someone familiar with Kerberos > implementations it'd be more tempting to move it. > > I do think we should add a note to ^/README.md with a short description > of the krb5/ directory, though.
This is a good idea. > > Thanks, > > Kyle Evans -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <c...@freebsd.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org NTP: <c...@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org e**(i*pi)+1=0
