On Fri, 27 Jun 2025, Andriy Gapon wrote:

The branch main has been updated by avg:

URL: 
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=5aedb8b1d4a6c099eaa0a65f8fcbdcc4aba8f75b

commit 5aedb8b1d4a6c099eaa0a65f8fcbdcc4aba8f75b
Author:     Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org>
AuthorDate: 2025-06-23 21:43:35 +0000
Commit:     Andriy Gapon <a...@freebsd.org>
CommitDate: 2025-06-27 07:19:15 +0000

   mmc_da: fix garbage in disk->d_attachment

   The garbage resulted from reading the value from a ccb which was
   originally populated by XPT_PATH_INQ operation but then overwritten by
   XPT_GET_TRAN_SETTINGS operation.

   The problem could probably be fixed by re-ordering the
   XPT_GET_TRAN_SETTINGS operation, but it seems like the operation was
   redundant.  Besides, the ccb is declared not as union ccb but as struct
   ccb_pathinq, so using it for XPT_GET_TRAN_SETTINGS was questionable.

   I opted for replacing a call to sdda_get_max_data (which uses
   XPT_GET_TRAN_SETTINGS internally) with using maxio provided by the
   XPT_PATH_INQ operation.

   This also required fixing mmc_cam_sim_default_action as controllers
   return maximum I/O size in sectors, but maxio value should be in bytes.

   MFC after:      2 weeks
---
sys/cam/mmc/mmc_da.c  | 4 +---
sys/cam/mmc/mmc_sim.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sys/cam/mmc/mmc_da.c b/sys/cam/mmc/mmc_da.c
index fc29a1925c66..1c455e1951d7 100644
--- a/sys/cam/mmc/mmc_da.c
+++ b/sys/cam/mmc/mmc_da.c
@@ -1572,9 +1572,7 @@ sdda_add_part(struct cam_periph *periph, u_int type, 
const char *name,
        part->disk->d_gone = sddadiskgonecb;
        part->disk->d_name = part->name;
        part->disk->d_drv1 = part;
-       part->disk->d_maxsize =
-           MIN(maxphys, sdda_get_max_data(periph,
-                   (union ccb *)&cpi) * mmc_get_sector_size(periph));

This now results in:

sys/cam/mmc/mmc_da.c:1202:1: warning: unused function 'sdda_get_max_data' 
[-Wunused-function]
 1202 | sdda_get_max_data(struct cam_periph *periph, union ccb *ccb)
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.

Can the function be garbage collected?


+       part->disk->d_maxsize = MIN(maxphys, cpi.maxio);
        part->disk->d_unit = cnt;
        part->disk->d_flags = 0;
        strlcpy(part->disk->d_descr, sc->card_id_string,
diff --git a/sys/cam/mmc/mmc_sim.c b/sys/cam/mmc/mmc_sim.c
index 104916a41782..ab6daffb0995 100644
--- a/sys/cam/mmc/mmc_sim.c
+++ b/sys/cam/mmc/mmc_sim.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ mmc_cam_sim_default_action(struct cam_sim *sim, union ccb 
*ccb)
                        ccb->ccb_h.status = CAM_REQ_INVALID;
                } else {
                        mmc_path_inq(&ccb->cpi, "Deglitch Networks",
-                           sim, mmc.host_max_data);
+                           sim, mmc.host_max_data * MMC_SECTOR_SIZE);
                }
                break;
        case XPT_GET_TRAN_SETTINGS:


--
Bjoern A. Zeeb                                                     r15:7

Reply via email to