The branch main has been updated by bz:

URL: 
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=c816f64e66a0d21196ede35da3eca19e54b59a03

commit c816f64e66a0d21196ede35da3eca19e54b59a03
Author:     Bjoern A. Zeeb <b...@freebsd.org>
AuthorDate: 2025-04-13 16:13:22 +0000
Commit:     Bjoern A. Zeeb <b...@freebsd.org>
CommitDate: 2025-04-14 14:06:50 +0000

    LinuxKPI: 802.11: plug mbuf leak
    
    Now that we are doing VHT it is possible to overflow the mbufqs
    we use in the TX and RX paths.  Check the return code of mbufq_enqueue()
    deal with any error accordingly and propagate it.
    
    Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation
    MFC after:      3 days
---
 sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_80211.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_80211.c 
b/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_80211.c
index 149926a54907..73e1e7b1e1ad 100644
--- a/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_80211.c
+++ b/sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_80211.c
@@ -4519,6 +4519,7 @@ lkpi_ic_raw_xmit(struct ieee80211_node *ni, struct mbuf 
*m,
         const struct ieee80211_bpf_params *params __unused)
 {
        struct lkpi_sta *lsta;
+       int error;
 
        lsta = ni->ni_drv_data;
        LKPI_80211_LSTA_TXQ_LOCK(lsta);
@@ -4542,7 +4543,21 @@ lkpi_ic_raw_xmit(struct ieee80211_node *ni, struct mbuf 
*m,
        }
 
        /* Queue the packet and enqueue the task to handle it. */
-       mbufq_enqueue(&lsta->txq, m);
+       error = mbufq_enqueue(&lsta->txq, m);
+       if (error != 0) {
+               LKPI_80211_LSTA_TXQ_UNLOCK(lsta);
+               /*
+                * Free the mbuf (do NOT release ni ref for the m_pkthdr.rcvif!
+                * ieee80211_raw_output() does that in case of error).
+                */
+               m_free(m);
+#ifdef LINUXKPI_DEBUG_80211
+               if (linuxkpi_debug_80211 & D80211_TRACE_TX)
+                       ic_printf(ni->ni_ic, "%s: mbufq_enqueue failed: %d\n",
+                           __func__, error);
+#endif
+               return (ENETDOWN);
+       }
        taskqueue_enqueue(taskqueue_thread, &lsta->txq_task);
        LKPI_80211_LSTA_TXQ_UNLOCK(lsta);
 
@@ -6416,7 +6431,7 @@ linuxkpi_ieee80211_rx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct 
sk_buff *skb,
        struct ieee80211vap *vap;
        struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr;
        struct lkpi_sta *lsta;
-       int i, offset, ok;
+       int i, offset, ok, error;
        uint8_t rssi;
        bool is_beacon;
 
@@ -6627,7 +6642,18 @@ skip_device_ts:
                goto err;
        }
 
-       mbufq_enqueue(&lhw->rxq, m);
+       error = mbufq_enqueue(&lhw->rxq, m);
+       if (error != 0) {
+               LKPI_80211_LHW_RXQ_UNLOCK(lhw);
+               m_freem(m);
+               counter_u64_add(ic->ic_ierrors, 1);
+#ifdef LINUXKPI_DEBUG_80211
+               if (linuxkpi_debug_80211 & D80211_TRACE_RX)
+                       ic_printf(ni->ni_ic, "%s: mbufq_enqueue failed: %d\n",
+                           __func__, error);
+#endif
+               goto err;
+       }
        taskqueue_enqueue(taskqueue_thread, &lhw->rxq_task);
        LKPI_80211_LHW_RXQ_UNLOCK(lhw);
 

Reply via email to