On 11/01/22 23:38, John Baldwin wrote:
The branch main has been updated by jhb:

URL: 
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=cfb7b942bed72cb798b869d2e36e0097dbd243b2

commit cfb7b942bed72cb798b869d2e36e0097dbd243b2
Author:     John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org>
AuthorDate: 2022-01-11 22:18:57 +0000
Commit:     John Baldwin <j...@freebsd.org>
CommitDate: 2022-01-11 22:18:57 +0000

     cryptosoft: Use multi-block encrypt/decrypt for non-AEAD ciphers.
Reviewed by: markj
     Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation
     Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D33531

Hi,

I've just updated to recent head. I have a laptop using ZFS on geli setup and now it's unable to boot.

I've seen the failure starting with git revision 3284f4925f697ad7cc2aa4761ff5cf6ce98fd623 (LRO: Don't merge ACK and non-ACK packets together - 01/13/22, 17:18)

it's still there with revision fe453891d7ccc8e173d9293b67f5b4608c5378dd (01/14/22 11:00:08)

While a kernel from the binary snapshot downloaded from mirrors compiled from revision ac413189f53524e489c900b3cfaa80a1552875ca (vfslist.c: initialize skipvfs variable 01/05/2022) is able to boot correctly.

The machine panics as soon as it tries to work with geli, this is why I am replying to this commit message. I'm not completely sure this is the commit to blame, but it sure is related.

I have not been able to save the backtrace to file, but the last two calls are to:

crypto_cursor_segment()
swcr_encdec()

so it points to the last part of this patch.

I have taken a picture of the backtrace on screen, you can find here:

https://www.madpilot.net/cloud/s/6KtAXx6Q7R9dJ7c


BTW this is happening on an older laptop without any crypto hardware, I use this machine to test head before upgrading other ones. Maybe this is exposing a bug not showing up on newer hardware?


Do you have any clue? Looks like something broke with this bunch of commits to the geli/crypto stuff.

I can try bisecting tomorrow, but it can take a little time.

Thanks in advance.

--
Guido Falsi <madpi...@freebsd.org>

Reply via email to