On Mon, May 31, 2021, 1:11 PM Ed Maste <ema...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 11:51, Alan Somers <asom...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> I think this file isn't the right place for (another copy of) this > >> text; perhaps the CODEOWNERS file should just reference the top-level > >> MAINTAINERS? > > > > Except that CODEOWNERS is in a format that tools know how to parse. If > anything, MAINTAINERS should be a symlink to CODEOWNERS. > > At least the file's location and user IDs suggest that it is specific > to GitHub; in any case I don't really care which one points to which. > I hope we can agree though that we don't really want two different > files representing code ownership in different ways that both > independently refer to a third mechanism for recording code ownership > that's external to the source tree?
It also works on gitlab, FWIW. The format is standard. Bummer we can't generate it based on where it is published... Warner _______________________________________________ dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-commits-src-main To unsubscribe, send any mail to "dev-commits-src-main-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
