Hi,

On 4/12/21 4:30 PM, Cy Schubert wrote:
  Whereas freebsd_device or fbsd_device is more
descriptive and gives the struct the status it deserves
There are other non-FreeBSD OS'es using this structure too. I think freebsd_device is too specific. How about bsd_device? In this world of cross OS compatibility I see a point not being too generic when naming structures.

--HPS
_______________________________________________
dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-commits-src-main
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "dev-commits-src-main-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to