Hi,
On 4/12/21 4:30 PM, Cy Schubert wrote:
Whereas freebsd_device or fbsd_device is more
descriptive and gives the struct the status it deserves
There are other non-FreeBSD OS'es using this structure too. I think
freebsd_device is too specific. How about bsd_device? In this world of
cross OS compatibility I see a point not being too generic when naming
structures.
--HPS
_______________________________________________
dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-commits-src-main
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "dev-commits-src-main-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"