On 2025-09-04 22:14, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 09:43:13PM -0700, James Gritton wrote:
On 2025-09-04 16:43, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>    jd = malloc(sizeof(*jd), M_JAILDESC, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO);
>    error = falloc_caps(td, &fp, fdp, 0, NULL);
>    finit(fp, priv_check_cred(fp->f_cred, PRIV_JAIL_SET) == 0
>        ? FREAD | FWRITE : FREAD, DTYPE_JAILDESC, jd, &jaildesc_ops);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^ '?' should be placed on the previous line

I wasn't aware of this requirement; style(9) is silent on it.
In fact style(9) contains the explicit requirement:
If you have to wrap a long statement, put the operator at the end of the
     line.
There are a lot more of this pattern repeated in the commit.

Ah, yes it says that.  I was scanning examples looking for the "?",
and missed the general statement.  I don't think it's the best move
for the ?: operator in particular, but I appreciate consistency in
style.  I can change that in kern_jaildesc.c, but it's a little
trickier in kern_jail.c since it's already replete with me having done
it wrong over the years.

> Generated files should have been committed as a follow-up, not in the
> same commit as written code.

The FreeBSD Wiki explicitly allows it in the same commit.
I always objected against this practice. For instance, the commit message for this commit is even less useful because most of the limit was filled with the auto-generated stuff, instead of the code. Same for reading the
commits with log.

Could you please point me to the wiki page?

https://wiki.freebsd.org/AddingSyscalls#Committing

> jaildesc_find() returns EBADF when passed file type is not DTYPE_JAIL.
> Normally EBADF means that the object underlying the file is invalidated,
> like vnode is reclaimed, tty is revoked, etc. For the wrong type, EINVAL
> should be returned.

That's part of the code that I lifted from process descriptors, nearly
identical to procdesc_find.  A check of other c_type checks shows
EBADF isn't uncommon.
So procdesc is wrong as well, I think.

The existing code base is quite inconsistent.  I some EINVAL, some
EBADF (procdesc, kqueue, fcntl), also EPERM, ENODEV, ENOTSUPP, EPIPE,
and ENOTSOCK.  EINVAL is the most common, but there are enough EBADF
that I feel I can keep it.

- Jamie

Reply via email to