On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 01:39:48PM -0700, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 04:21:01PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > H> >>> Why? Just because it's shorter? > H> >> > H> >> Yes, just because "int" is the redundant. > H> > > H> > Definitely that's true for computers. In case of humans it's debatable. > H> > H> Would uint32_t be more clear? > > IMHO, it definitely will be more clear. Cleaner or not, replacing u_int by uint32_t is semantic change, not an editorial.
- git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substitute "un... Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substitute... Piotr P. Stefaniak
- Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Substi... Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4): Su... Piotr P. Stefaniak
- Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - usb(4)... Hans Petter Selasky
- Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - u... Piotr P. Stefaniak
- Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main... John Baldwin
- Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - u... Warner Losh
- Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main - u... Gleb Smirnoff
- Re: git: 62d42655bca1 - main... Konstantin Belousov