On 13 Mar 2021, at 18:38, Tijl Coosemans <t...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:54:49 GMT Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> wrote: >> The branch main has been updated by dim: >> >> URL: >> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=9097e3cbcac455eb0dedd097d8d5548c72568d0a >> >> commit 9097e3cbcac455eb0dedd097d8d5548c72568d0a >> Author: Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> >> AuthorDate: 2021-03-13 13:54:24 +0000 >> Commit: Dimitry Andric <d...@freebsd.org> >> CommitDate: 2021-03-13 13:54:24 +0000 >> >> Partially revert libcxxrt changes to avoid _Unwind_Exception change ... >> --- a/contrib/libcxxrt/unwind-itanium.h >> +++ b/contrib/libcxxrt/unwind-itanium.h >> @@ -79,12 +79,9 @@ struct _Unwind_Exception >> { >> uint64_t exception_class; >> _Unwind_Exception_Cleanup_Fn exception_cleanup; >> - uintptr_t private_1; >> - uintptr_t private_2; >> -#if __SIZEOF_POINTER__ == 4 >> - uint32_t reserved[3]; >> -#endif >> - } __attribute__((__aligned__)); >> + unsigned long private_1; >> + unsigned long private_2; >> + } ; > > Shouldn't these definitions be the same as the ones in GCC?
If you want to keep the ABI compatible with what it was, no. Otherwise, you could consider it. But for what gain? -Dimitry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
