On 18 Feb 2021, at 23:57, Brandon Bergren <bdra...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Jessica Clarke wrote: >>> But, I wonder, what does CALL_ELF mean? Is it for old 64bit PowerPC ABI, >>> that was abandoned with the switch to ELFv2? >> >> Yes, _CALL_ELF == 2 for ELFv2. I highly doubt the defines were needed >> for the ELFv1 ABI, but they're especially redundant now. Presumably >> David's original fixed commit[1] added powerpc64 to that list because >> TLS wasn't yet supported in LLVM; that happened later in 2012 and our >> wiki changed it to being implemented in December 2012[2]. So I suspect >> it should have been deleted 8 years ago. > > FreeBSD 13 will be the first ELFv2 release. FreeBSD 12 and below are ELFv1. > > The reason for the line was to avoid breaking things during the development > period for ELFv2. Switching TLS on was one of the things I did at the same > time as the official ELFv2 transition. See > 2db975b0eb0f3378a39d63eeabe4e3617f4557f0. > > This is NOT an 8 year old change, but I believe it can go away in HEAD as > long as the change isn't MFC'd to 12 or earlier.
But TLS isn't broken for ELFv1? Otherwise jemalloc would die in a fire and nothing would ever work. TLS should have been working for ELFv1 for many years by this point. Jess _______________________________________________ dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-commits-src-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "dev-commits-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"