Right, but you need older version patch from 818843. Since StevenLee had proposed a new version based on newest mozilla-central code base, the step can be simplified.
However, I am not sure the detailed step to do it now. I think StevenLee can help you on it. Best Regards, Chiajung ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Natal" <[email protected]> To: "Chiajung Hung" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected], "Maire Reavy" <[email protected]>, "Fabrice Desre" <[email protected]>, "Steven" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 10:44:06 PM Subject: Re: Webrtc All this after I revert to 121455, right? Thanks, Andre On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Chiajung Hung < [email protected] > wrote: Andre, When you apply patch in Bug 818843, there is some change in supplement.gypi which should be removed after you apply patch in Bug 825112. The step should be: (1) Apply patch in 818843 (2) Apply patch in 825112 (3) hg st (4) find supplement.gypi from the change list (5) hg revert [filename] Best Regards, Chiajung ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Natal" < [email protected] > To: "Chiajung Hung" < [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] , "Maire Reavy" < [email protected] >, "Fabrice Desre" < [email protected] >, "Steven" < [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 2:56:10 AM Subject: Re: Webrtc Steven and Chiajung, I am doing well until this step: "revert supplement.gypi to build pass" What should I do this moment? Thanks Andre On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Chiajung Hung < [email protected] > wrote: Hi Andre, Since mozilla-central merged some commit that prevent our patch set to be built, you will have to rollback to previous version. As I know, you can (1) hg pull (2) hg update (3) hg update -r 121455 Then apply the patch from Bug 818843 and the patch in Bug 825112. And after apply these 2 patches, I think you will have to revert supplement.gypi to build pass. If you get any build problem, you can ask StevenLee for help :) Best Regards, Chiajung ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Natal" < [email protected] > To: "Chiajung Hung" < [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] , "Maire Reavy" < [email protected] >, "Fabrice Desre" < [email protected] >, "Steven" < [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 8:31:13 AM Subject: Re: Webrtc Chianjung, how can I compile a build of b2g including your 825112 patch and flash my unagi? I can stream the audio to my server to do the speech recognition. There is some repository where I can have this built where I will only need to flash it? Thanks Andre On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Chiajung Hung < [email protected] > wrote: Hi Andre, To record audio to file, you will need MediaRecord API which is under construction now. We are planing to implement encoder with MediaRecord API but it is a huge staff and I am afraid that it can not be available very soon. Best Regards, Chiajung ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Natal" < [email protected] > To: "Steven" < [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] , "Chiajung Hung" < [email protected] >, "Maire Reavy" < [email protected] >, "Fabrice Desre" < [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, February 7, 2013 5:40:23 AM Subject: Re: Webrtc I only need to record audio to filesystem to then upload to my server. 16khz would be fine, compressed audio would be awesome... Em 06/02/2013 02:23, "Steven" < [email protected] > escreveu: Hi all, Chiajung and I are working on porting WebRTC to B2G. Chiajung's patch can capture camera and microphone from unagi. You can check bug 825110 and bug 825112. On my local build, I can use my unagi to receive A/V from my laptop smoothly. Under such scenario, b2g and browser use about 80% of CPU. I think it's resulted from that we have only software VP8 decoder. So that I cannot send streaming to other device at the same time. And there is one more problem that I cannot add unagi's audio stream to a peerconnection object. I will try to figure out where the problem is. Steven On 02/06/2013 08:05 AM, Andre Natal wrote: I can record audio with CameraControl and disable the video render on canvas? On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Maire Reavy < [email protected] > wrote: On 2/1/2013 1:05 PM, Fabrice Desre wrote: On 02/01/2013 07:18 AM, Andre Natal wrote: Anyone have news regards webrtc? Any expectation to have it until end of this month? You can follow https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/* *show_bug.cgi?id=750011 < https: // bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_ bug.cgi?id=750011 >and the dependent bugs. There's almost no chance this will be done for the end of the month. Fabrice We hope to have WebRTC on B2G available by the end of this year. gUM support should be available before full WebRTC support. We'll be able to accelerate this if we can get more developers contributing to the WebRTC project. -Maire -- Maire Reavy < [email protected] > Mozilla ______________________________ **_________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/** listinfo/dev-b2g < https:// lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/ dev-b2g > -- Steven Mozilla Taiwan _______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
