On Oct 17, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Justin Lebar <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm all in favor of using an updated version of ccache.  If the
> prebuilt binary is very old, it's likely significantly slower than the
> newest version, on both cache hits and cache misses.

> 
> But could you detail the problems you've encountered?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7827 breaks the build, and like you 
said it's also much slower than the current stable version.

To fix it I simply symlinked /usr/local/bin/ccache to 
B2G/prebuilt/darwin-x86/ccache.

-- reuben
_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g

Reply via email to