> We should be able to get gutenprint back
> on armhf in time for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS,
                              26.04 :)
> assuming armhf is still around for us then.
It is supposed to be

> I also added a reminder Jira card for
> myself to re-enable 32-bit builds for
> gutenprint once Debian 13 is released
> since they will be past the time_t
> transition then.

It is entirely unclear to me what the value of this would be to do later
if it's not worth doing now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gutenprint in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081090

Title:
  gutenprint FTBFS due to 64-bit restriction

Status in gutenprint package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The FTBFS[0] report shows an issue for gutenprint:

    The following packages have unmet dependencies:
     sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy : Depends: architecture-is-64-bit but it 
is not installable
    E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
    apt-get failed.
    E: Package installation failed

  The problem is that the package now no longer builds for armhf[1],
  which is 32-bit.  This appears to have been an intentional change by
  Debian:

    gutenprint (5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-2) unstable; urgency=medium

      * do not build this package on 32bit architectures anymore
        Closes: #1064088
        Closes: #1064089
        There was no patch attached to #1064089, so I can not reproduce the
        problems mentioned in #1064088. I am fed up with this poorly done
        transition, so I won't spend more time with this. Sorry 32bit people.

     -- Thorsten Alteholz <deb...@alteholz.de>  Fri, 26 Apr 2024
  23:10:00 +0200

  The transition referenced in the changelog is the time_t transition
  performed late last cycle; presumably then reversing this change in
  Ubuntu would merely exchange this FTBFS for a different one.  (Perhaps
  one avenue of solution would be to create the requested time_t patch
  for #1064088?)

  The question is then if the armhf binary for gutenprint was deleted
  from the archive, would that result in other issues within the
  printing stack?

  0: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20240912-oracular-oracular.html#ubuntu-server-pkgset
  1: 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/5.3.4.20220624T01008808d602-3/+build/28712797

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/2081090/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to