Only the source and bin:native-architecture was requested.
Promoted these now that all is approved and agreed.
Let us see if that allows things to migrate and resolve without further
mismatches.
Override component to main
native-architecture 0.2.3 in plucky amd64: universe/devel/optional/100% -> main
native-architecture 0.2.3 in plucky arm64: universe/devel/optional/100% -> main
native-architecture 0.2.3 in plucky armhf: universe/devel/optional/100% -> main
native-architecture 0.2.3 in plucky i386: universe/devel/optional/100% -> main
native-architecture 0.2.3 in plucky ppc64el: universe/devel/optional/100% ->
main
native-architecture 0.2.3 in plucky riscv64: universe/devel/optional/100% ->
main
native-architecture 0.2.3 in plucky s390x: universe/devel/optional/100% -> main
Override [y|N]? y
7 publications overridden.
Override component to main
architecture-properties 0.2.3 in plucky: universe/misc -> main
Override [y|N]? y
1 publication overridden.
** Changed in: architecture-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gobject-introspection in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2080965
Title:
[MIR] architecture-properties
Status in architecture-properties package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in gobject-introspection package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
[Availability]
The package architecture-properties is already in Ubuntu universe.
The package architecture-properties build for the architectures it is
designed to work on.
It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 arm64 armhf ppc64el
riscv64 s390x
Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/architecture-properties
[Rationale]
- The package architecture-properties is required in Ubuntu main as a new
Depends of libglib2.0-dev
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/glib/-/commit/da4b3d48
- The package architecture-properties will generally be useful for a large
part of our user base
- There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or
should go universe->main instead of this.
- The binary package native-architecture needs to be in main as a depends of
libglib2.0-dev
- The package architecture-properties is required in Ubuntu main for
next cycle for us to be able to keep the glib2.0 package in sync with
Debian.
[Security]
- No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past
- no `suid` or `sgid` binaries
- no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin`
- Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs
- Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024).
- Package does not expose any external endpoints
- Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software
[Quality assurance - function/usage]
- The package works well right after install
[Quality assurance - maintenance]
- The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and does
not have too many, long-term & critical, open bugs
- Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/architecture-properties/+bug
- Debian
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=architecture-properties
- Upstream is Debian
- The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support
[Quality assurance - testing]
- The package does not run a test at build time because it's just Debian
packaging tweaks and a small wrapper and there is no real point doing build
testing.
- The package runs an autopkgtest, and is currently passing on
amd64 arm64 armhf ppc64el riscv64 s390x, link to test logs
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/architecture-properties
- The package does have not failing autopkgtests on the supported
architecture right now (it's failing on i386 which isn't a target for
the wrapper)
[Quality assurance - packaging]
- debian/watch is not present because it is a native package
- debian/control defines a correct Maintainer
- This package has minor lintian warnings
# lintian --pedantic architecture-properties_0.2.2_amd64.changes
running with root privileges is not recommended!
W: architecture-properties source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends
architecture-properties
W: architecture-properties source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends
cross-exe-wrapper
W: architecture-properties source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends
native-architecture
Which we will report to Debian
- Please link to a recent build log of the package
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/749336513/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-amd64.architecture-properties_0.2.2_BUILDING.txt.gz
- Please attach the full output you have got from
`lintian --pedantic` as an extra post to this bug.
- Lintian overrides are not present
- This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages.
- This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies
- The package will not be installed by default
- Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/architecture-
properties/-/blob/main/debian/rules
[UI standards]
- It is not end-user facing (does not need translation)
[Dependencies]
- No further depends or recommends dependencies that are not yet in main
[Standards compliance]
- This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy
[Maintenance/Owner]
- The owning team will be desktop-packages (at least for now since it's
pulled as a depends of glib2.0, but might make sense to be owned by foundation
as it's a cross arch helper) and I have their acknowledgement for that
commitment
- The future owning team is already subscribed to the package
- This does not use static builds
- This does not use vendored code
- This package is not rust based
- The package has been built within the last 3 months in the archive
- Build link on launchpad:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/architecture-properties/0.2.2
[Background information]
The Package description explains the package well
Upstream Name is architecture-properties
Link to upstream project
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/architecture-properties
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/architecture-properties/+bug/2080965/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
