** Description changed: - [placeholder for https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/1070] + upstream issue https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/1070 + [ Impact ] + + * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and justification + for backporting the fix to the stable release. + + * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an + explanation of how the upload fixes this bug. + + [ Test Plan ] + + * detailed instructions how to reproduce the bug + + * these should allow someone who is not familiar with the affected + package to reproduce the bug and verify that the updated package + fixes the problem. + + * if other testing is appropriate to perform before landing this + update, this should also be described here. + + [ Where problems could occur ] + + * Think about what the upload changes in the software. Imagine the + change is wrong or breaks something else: how would this show up? + + * It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before + upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important + to make the effort to think about what ''could'' happen in the event + of a regression. + + * This must never be "None" or "Low", or entirely an argument as to why + your upload is low risk. + + * This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered, + and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU. + + [ Other Info ] + + * Anything else you think is useful to include + + * Anticipate questions from users, SRU, +1 maintenance, security teams + and the Technical Board and address these questions in advance
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to adsys in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078245 Title: DCONF policy manager removes userdb on empty policy Status in adsys package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: upstream issue https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/1070 [ Impact ] * An explanation of the effects of the bug on users and justification for backporting the fix to the stable release. * In addition, it is helpful, but not required, to include an explanation of how the upload fixes this bug. [ Test Plan ] * detailed instructions how to reproduce the bug * these should allow someone who is not familiar with the affected package to reproduce the bug and verify that the updated package fixes the problem. * if other testing is appropriate to perform before landing this update, this should also be described here. [ Where problems could occur ] * Think about what the upload changes in the software. Imagine the change is wrong or breaks something else: how would this show up? * It is assumed that any SRU candidate patch is well-tested before upload and has a low overall risk of regression, but it's important to make the effort to think about what ''could'' happen in the event of a regression. * This must never be "None" or "Low", or entirely an argument as to why your upload is low risk. * This both shows the SRU team that the risks have been considered, and provides guidance to testers in regression-testing the SRU. [ Other Info ] * Anything else you think is useful to include * Anticipate questions from users, SRU, +1 maintenance, security teams and the Technical Board and address these questions in advance To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adsys/+bug/2078245/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
