I'm OK with releasing this one day short of the 7-day aging period. I don't think there is any gain in waiting an extra day for this update.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2041716 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 7.5.8 for lunar Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in libreoffice source package in Lunar: Fix Committed Bug description: [Impact] * LibreOffice 7.5.8 is in its eighth and last bugfix release of the 7.5 line: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.5#7.5.8_release * Version 7.5.7 is currently released in lunar. For a list of fixed bugs compared to 7.5.7 see the list of bugs fixed in the release candidates of 7.5.8 (that's a total of 21 bugs): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.5.8/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.5.8/RC2#List_of_fixed_bugs 7.5.8 RC2 is identical to the 7.5.8 release * Given the nature of the project, the complexity of the codebase and the high level of quality assurance upstream, it is preferable to SRU a minor release rather than cherry-pick selected bug fixes. [Testing] * Upstream testing. Bugs fixed upstream typically include unit/regression tests, and the release itself is extensively exercised (both in an automated manner and manually). * A recent set of upstream's automated jenkins testing can be found here: https://ci.libreoffice.org/job/gerrit_75/1762/ * More information about the upstream QA testing can be found here: * Automated tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Automated_Tests * Automated UI tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests * Regression tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests * Feature tests https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Feature_Tests * Launchpad testing. The libreoffice packages include autopkgtests that were run and verified as passing. Tested build can be found at https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15348703/+listing-archive-extra * [amd64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-ricotz-ppa/lunar/amd64/libr/libreoffice/20231029_113409_73daf@/log.gz * [arm64] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-ricotz-ppa/lunar/arm64/libr/libreoffice/20231029_195903_c198a@/log.gz * [armhf] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-ricotz-ppa/lunar/armhf/libr/libreoffice/20231029_204848_b6986@/log.gz * [ppc64el] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-ricotz-ppa/lunar/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20231029_113020_49f1b@/log.gz * [riscv64] not available * [s390x] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-lunar-ricotz-ppa/lunar/s390x/libr/libreoffice/20231029_131951_9ac3d@/log.gz * General smoke testing of all the applications in the office suite were carried out by going through the manual testplan as documented by: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/libreoffice [Regression Potential] * A minor release with a total of 21 bug fixes always carries the potential for introducing regressions, even though it is a bugfix-only release, meaning that no new features were added, and no existing features were removed. * A combination of autopkgtests and careful smoke testing as described above should provide reasonable confidence that no regressions sneaked in. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2041716/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
