I ran update-maintainer on the mesa source and uploaded again. Give the removal of PCI IDs, and the vague statement in the "Where things could go wrong" section of the bug description, I'd like to see a more clear statement saying that these IDs are already not available in the jammy kernel, and as such there is an even lesser risk of regression due to that.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1998893 Title: NV reverse prime HDMI has no output Status in OEM Priority Project: New Status in mesa package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in mesa source package in Jammy: Fix Committed Bug description: [Impact] The X failed to load glamoregl module on Dell's new platforms, the module is needed by NV dGPU. 十二 05 10:04:55 /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1292]: (II) LoadModule: "glamoregl" 十二 05 10:04:55 /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1292]: (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so 十二 05 10:04:55 /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1292]: (II) Module glamoregl: vendor="X.Org Foundation" 十二 05 10:04:55 /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1292]: compiled for 1.21.1.3, module version = 1.0.1 十二 05 10:04:55 /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1292]: ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4 十二 05 10:04:55 /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1292]: MESA: warning: Driver does not support the 0xa78b PCI ID. 十二 05 10:04:55 /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1292]: (II) modeset(0): Refusing to try glamor on llvmpipe 十二 05 10:04:55 /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[1292]: (II) modeset(0): glamor initialization failed [Fix] The upstream PR added missing ID for the platforms. https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/16320/ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/17569/ After creating the test build to include the PR above, ODM verified passed on those platform. [Test case] Install fixed package on the systems, check that display works. [Where things could go wrong] Although one commit drops a couple of pci-id's, they were synced from the kernel and such id's should not be in the wild. Other than that these just add id's and modify some vendor branding. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1998893/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
