@Bryan, I was about to comment back with the list discussion as well, it was ringing a bell but I didn't remember/found back at first where I read it, thanks :-)
Could you give some details about why/how libpinying is a better way to go? It seems to be that way from a maintainance perspective but we should probably look at the feature parity/difference and get some input from Chinese users/translators before deciding -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to ibus-sunpinyin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1735362 Title: ibus-sunpinyin: port to Python3 needed Status in ibus-libpinyin package in Ubuntu: New Status in ibus-sunpinyin package in Ubuntu: New Status in ibus-sunpinyin package in Debian: New Bug description: ibus-sunpinyin: port to Python3 needed. Currently in the live seed, package owned by desktop-packages. Considering the lack of upstream maintenance, demotion might be an option. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ibus-libpinyin/+bug/1735362/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
