Launchpad has imported 11 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490048.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-09T16:48:44+00:00 Jan wrote: When I start deja-dup to make an backup to an external USB HDD (which worked fine in the past), this error is displayed: InvalidBackendURL: missing // - relative paths not supported for scheme gio+invalid: gio+invalid:// Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-09T17:02:27+00:00 Jan wrote: The external USB HDD is encrypted. When I first mount the disk, so that it is available, and then start deja-dup from the command line, I get window with this message: Storage location not available Waiting for '5.0 TB Encrypted' to become connected... Note that the name of the mount point is different: ls /run/media/jan/ '5.0 TB Partition' In the dropdownlistbox for the Storage location in deja-dup, I only see: '5.0 TB Encrypted', not '5.0 TB Partition'. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-14T18:28:54+00:00 Jan wrote: Fixed upstream. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-14T20:44:26+00:00 Philip wrote: Shouldn’t this bug remain open to track inclusion of that patch into the Fedora package for deja-dup? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-15T09:55:10+00:00 Jan wrote: In the meanwhile, I worked around the bug by selecting manually the destination location again. This means that I cannot test whether the bug is fixed. For now I will reopen the bug. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-15T13:40:40+00:00 Fedora wrote: deja-dup-36.1-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c27d77c788 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-15T13:41:05+00:00 Fedora wrote: deja-dup-36.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-51979dace2 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-15T16:56:04+00:00 Fedora wrote: deja-dup-36.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-51979dace2 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-16T04:25:43+00:00 Fedora wrote: deja-dup-36.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c27d77c788 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-23T20:21:50+00:00 Fedora wrote: deja-dup-36.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2017-09-30T06:35:08+00:00 Fedora wrote: deja-dup-36.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/comments/16 ** Changed in: deja-dup (Fedora) Status: Unknown => Fix Released ** Changed in: deja-dup (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Undecided -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to deja-dup in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717230 Title: InvalidBackendURL: missing // - relative paths not supported for scheme gio+invalid: gio+invalid:// Status in Déjà Dup: Fix Released Status in deja-dup package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in deja-dup package in Fedora: Fix Released Bug description: 1. I plug in my external USB HDD. 2. I enter the LUKS password to unlock it. 3. The disk is automatically mounted. 4. Deja-dup shows a popup window with this text: InvalidBackendURL: missing // - relative paths not supported for scheme gio+invalid: gio+invalid:// It might be that I renamed the partions on the disk. I'm using Fedora 26 fully up-to-date. lsb_release -d Description: Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) dnf list installed | grep deja-dup deja-dup.x86_64 35.6-1.fc26 @updates deja-dup-nautilus.x86_64 35.6-1.fc26 @updates To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/deja-dup/+bug/1717230/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
