Personally I don't think gyp would cause a lot trouble and the main problem would be the dependency to framework libraries. Would it be possible to split the package into two sources or something like that so we are able build only ibus/fcitx support from a source that's OK to MIR? I don't think we want to MIR all of the frameworks.
I'll have a look at kkc soon, but if mozc is preferred we'd better to find a solution rather than applying a work around, :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to language-selector in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439006 Title: Install Fcitx for Japanese users Status in im-config package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in language-selector package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: According to my proposal [1], Fcitx should be default for Japanese uses on Vivid release cycle. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2015-March/004645.html Ref: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language- selector/+bug/1430893 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/im-config/+bug/1439006/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
