Launchpad has imported 10 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84315.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2014-09-25T08:31:29+00:00 Rico Tzschichholz wrote: Created attachment 106836 Example hsqldb database Numeric are not correctly display and either an empty field or "0" is shown. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1373928/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2014-09-25T08:31:54+00:00 Rico Tzschichholz wrote: Created attachment 106837 Displayed with 4.2.6.3 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1373928/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2014-09-25T08:32:13+00:00 Rico Tzschichholz wrote: Created attachment 106838 Displayed with 4.3.2.2 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1373928/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2014-09-25T08:34:00+00:00 Rico Tzschichholz wrote: As reported to me this was working as expected in 4.3.1.2 as well. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1373928/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2014-09-25T09:16:46+00:00 Björn Michaelsen wrote: UNCONFIRMED->NEW: was confirmed by an independent party. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1373928/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2014-09-25T09:22:11+00:00 Björn Michaelsen wrote: Severity Critical unless this is a 4.3.0->4.3.2 regression. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1373928/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2014-09-25T11:23:20+00:00 Tim Passingham wrote: I reported this to Rico this morning, assuming it was a new ubuntu release problem. I was previously running 4.3.1.2 from the ubuntu ppa. I was also running 4.3.2 development version direct from libreoffice to test another issue, version: Version: 4.3.2.0.0+ Build ID: b2d54aa61607e477cb4b81f1a70e555ee3adb0af TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@46-TDF, Branch:libreoffice-4-3, Time: 2014-08-20_23:12:37 This was OK, which is why I assumed it was an ubuntu release problem. I am a little concerned. If this applies on all platforms, then no databases at all will work with 4.3.2.2, with all that implies. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1373928/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2014-09-25T12:09:57+00:00 Tim Passingham wrote: I have done a little more investigation. First, on the libreoffice website 4.3.2.2 still seems to be a pre- release, so I am a little surprised it was release to the ubuntu normal release ppa. Secondly, on Windows 64 bit I downloaded 4.3.2.2 from the LO website and it is OK. Thirdly, I thought I should download the linux deb 4.3.2.2 from the libreoffice website. I did, and it works. So after a very brief series of tests this appears to be an ubuntu release problem, not a libreoffice problem. Please forgive me if I've made an error in my checking somewhere, but this issue seemed so serious for database users that I thought I should progress it as fast as possible. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1373928/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2014-09-25T13:04:21+00:00 Björn Michaelsen wrote: (In reply to comment #7) > First, on the libreoffice website 4.3.2.2 still seems to be a pre-release, > so I am a little surprised it was release to the ubuntu normal release ppa. "This PPA might contain the release candidate that is assumed to become the final release even before it is declared so by the Document Foundation (e.g. usually release candidate 2 for minor updates)." https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/ppa So nothing surprising there at all, if you read the PPA description. > Secondly, on Windows 64 bit I downloaded 4.3.2.2 from the LO website and it > is OK. > > Thirdly, I thought I should download the linux deb 4.3.2.2 from the > libreoffice website. I did, and it works. This is certainly interesting. Normally I would close the bug as NOTOURBUG here then (because it would be a distro bug only). I have an idea about the reason though, as I enabled mergedlibs on 4.3.2 and had to move some lib into it to get rid of circular deps: dbtools -- which sounds like it could cause this trouble. Adding distro bug reference. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1373928/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2014-09-25T13:13:55+00:00 Tim Passingham wrote: Björn, So much to read, so little time :-) Apologies - I should have re-read all of the PPA description. My mistake. Tim Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1373928/comments/10 ** Changed in: df-libreoffice Status: Unknown => Confirmed ** Changed in: df-libreoffice Importance: Unknown => Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1373928 Title: Numeric values are "not" shown and displayed as "0" Status in LibreOffice Productivity Suite: Confirmed Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: See upstream bug for details: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84315 Numeric are not correctly display and either an empty field or "0" is shown. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1373928/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
