** Also affects: gdm-guest-session (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: lightdm (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand)
** Changed in: lightdm-remote-session-freerdp (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gdm-guest-session in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577919
Title:
chromium-browser fails to start (guest account, OpenVZ): "Failed to
move to new PID namespace: Operation not permitted"
Status in Chromium Browser:
Unknown
Status in Light Display Manager:
Fix Released
Status in OpenVZ kernel (patchset):
Confirmed
Status in “gdm-guest-session” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in “lightdm” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in “lightdm-remote-session-freerdp” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in “lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in “gdm-guest-session” source package in Precise:
New
Status in “lightdm” source package in Precise:
In Progress
Status in “lightdm-remote-session-freerdp” source package in Precise:
Invalid
Status in “lightdm-remote-session-uccsconfigure” source package in Precise:
Invalid
Bug description:
Binary package hint: chromium-browser
[Impact]
Chromium-browser does not launch from guest session.
Fix by Jamie Strandboge:
"It would be nice if AppArmor could merge profiles, but we can't yet, so we
need to do like you initially did: have two mostly identical profiles. Because
the lightdm remote sessions are shipping policy copies, the maintenance cost is
getting high. I will be abstracting out the guest rules into
abstracations/lightdm and then have a small snippet using a child profile in
abstractions/lightdm_chromium-browser. The guest and remote lightdm profiles
can just include these and all the policy is in the abstractions. Using a
lightdm.d directory is a good idea, but upstream AppArmor is currently
discussing how to best handle .d directories like this, and I'd rather not add
another one until that discussions is finished."
[Test Case]
Login to the guest account after booting in Ubuntu Precise and try to run
Chromium-browser.
[Regression Potential]
Upstream work on AppArmor was considered here and a child profile was added
not touching the other policies so the regression potential is pretty low.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: chromium-browser 5.0.342.9~r43360-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun May 9 19:49:44 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Beta i386 (20100318)
ProcEnviron:
LANG=tr_TR.utf8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: chromium-browser
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/577919/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
