Launchpad has imported 9 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41232.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-09-26T07:33:51+00:00 Peter-schmidt-z wrote: I have installed LO 3.4.3 on some very old PCs (P3, 500 MHz, 512 MB RAM) running Windows XP. When starting up, it takes about 1:20 minutes for the application to start. Once LO is up and running, it runs quite well. Even opening new documents via the quickstarter only takes seconds but is not an option (see Bug No. 41229 about that). We also tried to improve startup by disabling the JRE but this only brought us some 5 seconds (btw. Oracle JRE6_27 is installed). The system is very optimized so there are no unnecessary jobs running in the back. System memory is almost free after windows startup. Almost no hard disc activity can be seen while starting LO, but the job runs at 99% CPU. Only in the last 10 seconds you can hear the HDD work heavily but this might be because some binaries are loaded late. This makes me think that this is _not_ a problem of low memory and swapping (and even if the HDD activity was because of swapping, this would only explain the last 10-20 seconds of the slow startup). There must be some way to improve the startup procedure, maybe by offering an alternative setup that does not load so many extensions/tool/translations or similar additions. We only have these very old PCs because this is a ground school with no almost no budget for the pupils PCs. Also, I think many educational projects in developing or third world countries have a similar problem (very old hardware) and deserve a bearable fast launching office solution. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/592176/comments/20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-08T07:53:45+00:00 Wolf wrote: The same on a PowerMac G4 at 1350 MHz. Opening a odt text file takes as long as 20 sec., from clicking into the editing window till being able to type the first character takes another 5 sec. This cannot really be true… (-; Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/592176/comments/21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-08T08:49:11+00:00 Peter-schmidt-z wrote: Obviously this problem is multiplatform/multi-OS. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/592176/comments/22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-12-23T12:38:39+00:00 Björn Michaelsen wrote: [This is an automated message.] This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases. Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1 more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org /RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/592176/comments/23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-08-14T14:03:40+00:00 Reisi007 wrote: Dear bug submitter! Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs. To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem. Yours! Florian Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/592176/comments/24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-08-14T14:04:36+00:00 Reisi007 wrote: Dear bug submitter! Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs. To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem. Yours! Florian Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/592176/comments/25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-08-14T14:09:06+00:00 Reisi007 wrote: Dear bug submitter! Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs. To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem. Yours! Florian Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/592176/comments/26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-08-14T14:11:07+00:00 Reisi007 wrote: Dear bug submitter! Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs. To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem. Yours! Florian Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/592176/comments/27 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-10-11T08:52:48+00:00 Peter-schmidt-z wrote: This is also an issue on WinXP, SP2 on a P4 2.8 GHz with 504 MB RAM. I started LO by clicking the "Libre Office" link (so no module is started directly) and measured the time. For the first 20 seconds nothing happend at all (no UI feedback). Then the spashscreen showed up and 6 seconds later the main menu for creating new documents was shown. The problem is, that the user does not notice the startup of the program for the first 20 seconds until the splash screen shows up. This is a corporate network setup, the software is deployed centralized. I will try and see if the newer versions are still affected and update this bug if it is still present. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/592176/comments/28 ** Changed in: df-libreoffice Status: Unknown => Confirmed ** Changed in: df-libreoffice Importance: Unknown => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to openoffice.org in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592176 Title: A first document opens very slowly Status in LibreOffice Productivity Suite: Confirmed Status in “libreoffice” package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Status in “openoffice.org” package in Ubuntu: Won't Fix Status in Baltix GNU/Linux: New Bug description: Binary package hint: openoffice.org It is very slow to open any first document in OOo. Either by double-clicking it, either by opening it after the opening of OOo, either a quite empty document just created with the same version of OOo, either a word processing document, either a spreadsheet... It takes about 10 seconds on a quite fast machine and about 30 seconds on a slower machine. Once a first document is opened, following documents open in less than one second. During the waiting time the machine does nothing visible : neither disk access, neither CPU activity. This problem seems to be new with Lucid and OOo 3.2 : I didn't notice it with Karmic and OOo 3.1. Lucid has been installed with fresh install on my both machines. I've tried to launch OOo with command line : openoffice.org essai.odt It's the same issue and nothing is written on standard output. I've also used strace (see attached file strace_OOo.txt) : the wait time occurs inside one of the last lines (just after "wait4(-1, " : wait4(-1, [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], 0, NULL) = 7162 This issue has already been reported on french forums (OOo and Ubuntu-fr) but nobody seems to have the beginning of a solution : http://user.services.openoffice.org/fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=22415&p=125249#p125249 http://forum.ubuntu-fr.org/viewtopic.php?pid=3539161#p3539161 Feel free to ask for more information ! Regards, Alain ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: openoffice.org 1:3.2.0-7ubuntu4.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic-pae 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic-pae i686 NonfreeKernelModules: hsfengine nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Jun 10 13:56:18 2010 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1) ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: openoffice.org To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/592176/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
